Comments on: Open Source and .net – not really an ideal partnership http://www.stum.de/2007/11/21/open-source-and-net-not-really-an-ideal-partnership/ Random thoughts of neat disorder Wed, 08 Sep 2010 00:19:03 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: Not Rocket Science » ASP.net MVC 2 TekPub Video Series Giveaway – The Results http://www.stum.de/2007/11/21/open-source-and-net-not-really-an-ideal-partnership/comment-page-1/#comment-13747 Not Rocket Science » ASP.net MVC 2 TekPub Video Series Giveaway – The Results Sat, 16 Jan 2010 04:52:05 +0000 http://www.stum.de/2007/11/21/open-source-and-net-not-really-an-ideal-partnership/#comment-13747 [...] myself I've started blogging again in November 2007, funnily enough with a posting about Open Source and .net. However, I never really tried to build a profile and advertise the blog, also I blog too [...] [...] myself I've started blogging again in November 2007, funnily enough with a posting about Open Source and .net. However, I never really tried to build a profile and advertise the blog, also I blog too [...]

]]> By: Not Rocket Science » Blog Software in the .net world - still sad http://www.stum.de/2007/11/21/open-source-and-net-not-really-an-ideal-partnership/comment-page-1/#comment-5015 Not Rocket Science » Blog Software in the .net world - still sad Wed, 29 Apr 2009 19:11:15 +0000 http://www.stum.de/2007/11/21/open-source-and-net-not-really-an-ideal-partnership/#comment-5015 [...] blogged in November 2007 about Open Source and .net, also talking about blog software. While I am happy to report that the [...] [...] blogged in November 2007 about Open Source and .net, also talking about blog software. While I am happy to report that the [...]

]]> By: Andrei Rinea http://www.stum.de/2007/11/21/open-source-and-net-not-really-an-ideal-partnership/comment-page-1/#comment-826 Andrei Rinea Sat, 18 Oct 2008 11:52:43 +0000 http://www.stum.de/2007/11/21/open-source-and-net-not-really-an-ideal-partnership/#comment-826 Yes, open source software for .net is still lacking a lot today. But it will improve in time, I'm sure. I, for example, am trying to finish (in my spare time) a small validator for ASP.NET Webforms which I want to publish as open-source. I have tried SubText, DasBlog and BlogEngine.NET and they all seem to suck. I mean if I recall right BlogEngine.NET at some point(s) loads ALL the posts in memory (RAM) which is ok for small and medium blogs but for LARGE blogs that would be unacceptable IMHO. Studying them I drew the conclusion that I'd rather write my own blog software rather than use any of these. Oh... and Community Server is a real bloatware. Paint.NET is on the other hand a real good example, just as you put it in this entry. I use it mainly. I don't have other similar software installed. I used to have Paint Shop Pro (can't stand Photoshop - too big, yes it can do EVERYTHING but too fat) but since Paint.NET I don't really need something else. That reminds me... I should donate a small amount to its creator. Yes, open source software for .net is still lacking a lot today. But it will improve in time, I'm sure. I, for example, am trying to finish (in my spare time) a small validator for ASP.NET Webforms which I want to publish as open-source.

I have tried SubText, DasBlog and BlogEngine.NET and they all seem to suck. I mean if I recall right BlogEngine.NET at some point(s) loads ALL the posts in memory (RAM) which is ok for small and medium blogs but for LARGE blogs that would be unacceptable IMHO.

Studying them I drew the conclusion that I'd rather write my own blog software rather than use any of these. Oh... and Community Server is a real bloatware.

Paint.NET is on the other hand a real good example, just as you put it in this entry. I use it mainly. I don't have other similar software installed. I used to have Paint Shop Pro (can't stand Photoshop - too big, yes it can do EVERYTHING but too fat) but since Paint.NET I don't really need something else. That reminds me... I should donate a small amount to its creator.

]]>