Comments on: A Safe String.SubString Extension Method http://www.stum.de/2009/02/27/a-safe-stringsubstring-extension-method/ Random thoughts of neat disorder Mon, 08 Mar 2010 01:18:08 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Andrei Rinea http://www.stum.de/2009/02/27/a-safe-stringsubstring-extension-method/comment-page-1/#comment-10386 Andrei Rinea Mon, 05 Oct 2009 14:17:06 +0000 http://www.stum.de/?p=434#comment-10386 Got bitten by these confusing numbers myself too. Ah well, these confusions will end in 4.0 :) Got bitten by these confusing numbers myself too. Ah well, these confusions will end in 4.0 :)

]]> By: mstum http://www.stum.de/2009/02/27/a-safe-stringsubstring-extension-method/comment-page-1/#comment-10368 mstum Sun, 04 Oct 2009 14:03:44 +0000 http://www.stum.de/?p=434#comment-10368 Indeed. It's the C# 3.0 Compiler included in .net 3.5. Confusing Version numbers :) Indeed. It's the C# 3.0 Compiler included in .net 3.5. Confusing Version numbers :)

]]> By: Andrei Rinea http://www.stum.de/2009/02/27/a-safe-stringsubstring-extension-method/comment-page-1/#comment-10349 Andrei Rinea Sat, 03 Oct 2009 21:55:51 +0000 http://www.stum.de/?p=434#comment-10349 A small correction : the .NET 3.5 compiler A small correction : the .NET 3.5 compiler

]]> By: software developers http://www.stum.de/2009/02/27/a-safe-stringsubstring-extension-method/comment-page-1/#comment-8656 software developers Tue, 11 Aug 2009 17:38:28 +0000 http://www.stum.de/?p=434#comment-8656 Cool, split can be used in this example as well Thanks Cool,

split can be used in this example as well

Thanks

]]>