<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why I think Internet Explorer is the best browser for JavaScript development&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stum.de/2010/02/09/why-i-think-internet-explorer-is-the-best-browser-for-javascript-development/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stum.de/2010/02/09/why-i-think-internet-explorer-is-the-best-browser-for-javascript-development/</link>
	<description>Random thoughts of neat disorder</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 00:19:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mstum</title>
		<link>http://www.stum.de/2010/02/09/why-i-think-internet-explorer-is-the-best-browser-for-javascript-development/comment-page-1/#comment-14851</link>
		<dc:creator>mstum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 06:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stum.de/?p=729#comment-14851</guid>
		<description>As said, for me it&#039;s the exact opposite. So far, each and every thing that didn&#039;t work in IE was a genuine bug in my Code, and often Chrome and Firefox just silently swallow/auto-correct the error. Maybe I just haven&#039;t ran into any issues - the style issue for example would be a non-issue as I&#039;d prefer server-side combining and compressing, but who knows, maybe I&#039;ll run into these issues at some time. But so far, I&#039;d rather work with a browser that reliably errors out than with browsers that decide to do their own stuff without telling me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As said, for me it's the exact opposite. So far, each and every thing that didn't work in IE was a genuine bug in my Code, and often Chrome and Firefox just silently swallow/auto-correct the error. Maybe I just haven't ran into any issues - the style issue for example would be a non-issue as I'd prefer server-side combining and compressing, but who knows, maybe I'll run into these issues at some time. But so far, I'd rather work with a browser that reliably errors out than with browsers that decide to do their own stuff without telling me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.stum.de/2010/02/09/why-i-think-internet-explorer-is-the-best-browser-for-javascript-development/comment-page-1/#comment-14846</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 03:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stum.de/?p=729#comment-14846</guid>
		<description>Doh, that was meant to be:

&quot;You couldn&#039;t PAY ME enough money to develop / debug in JavaScript in IE.&quot;

though you likely got that from the whole message. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doh, that was meant to be:</p>
<p>"You couldn't PAY ME enough money to develop / debug in JavaScript in IE."</p>
<p>though you likely got that from the whole message. <img src='http://www.stum.de/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.stum.de/2010/02/09/why-i-think-internet-explorer-is-the-best-browser-for-javascript-development/comment-page-1/#comment-14845</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 03:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stum.de/?p=729#comment-14845</guid>
		<description>You couldn&#039;t PAY ME enough money to develop / debug in JavaScript... I&#039;d happily take 50k/yr to develop in Firefox or Chrome vs. 450k/yr to develop in IE.

Just look at the number of IE bugs you&#039;d have to deal with first hand (even if you knew they existed!)

http://webbugtrack.blogspot.com/search/label/IE

IE has a 10:1 bug ratio versus ALL other browsers combined!

Like they say, If you&#039;d been developing for most of the last decade you would have already given up on IE... if you haven&#039;t... you haven&#039;t been doing it long enough!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You couldn't PAY ME enough money to develop / debug in JavaScript... I'd happily take 50k/yr to develop in Firefox or Chrome vs. 450k/yr to develop in IE.</p>
<p>Just look at the number of IE bugs you'd have to deal with first hand (even if you knew they existed!)</p>
<p><a href="http://webbugtrack.blogspot.com/search/label/IE" rel="nofollow">http://webbugtrack.blogspot.com/search/label/IE</a></p>
<p>IE has a 10:1 bug ratio versus ALL other browsers combined!</p>
<p>Like they say, If you'd been developing for most of the last decade you would have already given up on IE... if you haven't... you haven't been doing it long enough!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets die Not Rocket Science » Why I think Internet Explorer is the best browser for JavaScript development… erwähnt -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.stum.de/2010/02/09/why-i-think-internet-explorer-is-the-best-browser-for-javascript-development/comment-page-1/#comment-14542</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets die Not Rocket Science » Why I think Internet Explorer is the best browser for JavaScript development… erwähnt -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 14:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stum.de/?p=729#comment-14542</guid>
		<description>[...] Dieser Eintrag wurde auf Twitter von Michael Stum, Dorian Muthig erwähnt. Dorian Muthig sagte: I totally agree! :) http://tinyurl.com/yzlldgv [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dieser Eintrag wurde auf Twitter von Michael Stum, Dorian Muthig erwähnt. Dorian Muthig sagte: I totally agree! <img src='http://www.stum.de/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  <a href="http://tinyurl.com/yzlldgv" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/yzlldgv</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
