<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Extension method to replace multiple Chars in a string</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stum.de/2010/02/16/an-extension-method-to-replace-multiple-chars-in-a-string/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stum.de/2010/02/16/an-extension-method-to-replace-multiple-chars-in-a-string/</link>
	<description>Random thoughts of neat disorder</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 04:38:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mstum</title>
		<link>http://www.stum.de/2010/02/16/an-extension-method-to-replace-multiple-chars-in-a-string/comment-page-1/#comment-14703</link>
		<dc:creator>mstum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 02:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stum.de/?p=740#comment-14703</guid>
		<description>Haha, I had exactly the same thought as I started to all more &quot;rules&quot; and realized that keeping two lists in sync is stupid :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha, I had exactly the same thought as I started to all more "rules" and realized that keeping two lists in sync is stupid <img src='http://www.stum.de/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mabster</title>
		<link>http://www.stum.de/2010/02/16/an-extension-method-to-replace-multiple-chars-in-a-string/comment-page-1/#comment-14702</link>
		<dc:creator>mabster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 02:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stum.de/?p=740#comment-14702</guid>
		<description>Not bad, Michael. I almost feel, though, that you&#039;d be better off accepting an IDictionary rather than two lists of Char.

That way you have a definite one-to-one mapping of &quot;old&quot; to &quot;new&quot; characters, rather than relying on the two lists &quot;matching up&quot; item for item.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not bad, Michael. I almost feel, though, that you'd be better off accepting an IDictionary rather than two lists of Char.</p>
<p>That way you have a definite one-to-one mapping of "old" to "new" characters, rather than relying on the two lists "matching up" item for item.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

