Comments on: About http://www.stum.de Random thoughts of neat disorder Wed, 11 Jan 2012 04:38:35 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Just old 64 geezer http://www.stum.de/about/comment-page-1/#comment-67254 Just old 64 geezer Fri, 02 Dec 2011 14:21:18 +0000 #comment-67254 I noticed your c64 related question in certain site (stackxchange)... If you want to know more c64 stuff, mem things for it etc., feel free to email me and I answer what ever I can... Kinda curious here what kinda "game" you might be up to... I used to do c64 stuff (since i was kid) from like 1984 to mid 90's (and now and then later) so I prolly can answer some of your questions... I noticed your c64 related question in certain site (stackxchange)... If you want to know more c64 stuff, mem things for it etc., feel free to email me and I answer what ever I can... Kinda curious here what kinda "game" you might be up to... I used to do c64 stuff (since i was kid) from like 1984 to mid 90's (and now and then later) so I prolly can answer some of your questions...

]]> By: Jörg Loebnau http://www.stum.de/about/comment-page-1/#comment-64855 Jörg Loebnau Fri, 18 Nov 2011 11:03:20 +0000 #comment-64855 Hi there, Does anyone know how to use cmdsendmail with non-English characters? After regular sending failed, I tried to decode Umlauts etc. using HTML (ä as ä etc.) but I only got an error message: cmdsendmail Deutsch.xml CommandLine Send Mail 1.0.5 · http://www.Stum.de ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ ERROR: File Deutsch.xml is invalid! Message: Reference to undeclared entity 'Uuml'. Line 14, position 19. Finished execution on 2011-11-18 11:55:51 What could I do here? Thanks in advance, Jörg Hi there,

Does anyone know how to use cmdsendmail with non-English characters? After regular sending failed, I tried to decode Umlauts etc. using HTML (ä as ä etc.) but I only got an error message:

cmdsendmail Deutsch.xml
CommandLine Send Mail 1.0.5 · http://www.Stum.de
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯

ERROR: File Deutsch.xml is invalid!
Message: Reference to undeclared entity 'Uuml'. Line 14, position 19.

Finished execution on 2011-11-18 11:55:51

What could I do here?
Thanks in advance,

Jörg

]]> By: mstum http://www.stum.de/about/comment-page-1/#comment-382 mstum Tue, 08 Jul 2008 18:18:39 +0000 #comment-382 Hi, thanks for the comment! I don't have the exact Syntax handy right now, but you can work with the LimitExcept block. Repo3 is the easiest, as the first example (the one with Require valid-user) will allow every user to do stuff. For repo2, i _guess_ that something like <Location /repo2> DAV svn SVNPath c:\repos\repo2 AuthType Basic AuthName "Subversion Repository" AuthUserFile c:\svn-user-file Require user user1 user2 </Location> should do the trick: user1 and user2 can connect and do stuff, wheras user3 cannot access this at all. Repo1 is a bit more tricky. Again, i guess that something like <Location /svn/repo1> DAV svn SVNPath c:\repos\repo1 AuthType Basic AuthName "Subversion Repository" AuthUserFile c:\svn-user-file <Limit GET PROPFIND OPTIONS REPORT> Require user user3 </Limit> <LimitExcept GET PROPFIND OPTIONS REPORT> Require user user1 user2 </LimitExcept> </Location> could work, but i have not tested it. (Maybe user1 and user2 also need to be in the Limit-block or simply put require valid-user in there) Have a look at the documentation for Apache: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/core.html#limit I'll try to research some stuff a bit later (kinda busy at the moment) and create a follow up post on the various Options to allow finer-granulation. Hi,

thanks for the comment!
I don't have the exact Syntax handy right now, but you can work with the LimitExcept block.
Repo3 is the easiest, as the first example (the one with Require valid-user) will allow every user to do stuff.

For repo2, i _guess_ that something like
<Location /repo2>
DAV svn
SVNPath c:\repos\repo2
AuthType Basic
AuthName "Subversion Repository"
AuthUserFile c:\svn-user-file
Require user user1 user2
</Location>

should do the trick: user1 and user2 can connect and do stuff, wheras user3 cannot access this at all.

Repo1 is a bit more tricky. Again, i guess that something like
<Location /svn/repo1>
DAV svn
SVNPath c:\repos\repo1
AuthType Basic
AuthName "Subversion Repository"
AuthUserFile c:\svn-user-file
<Limit GET PROPFIND OPTIONS REPORT>
Require user user3
</Limit>
<LimitExcept GET PROPFIND OPTIONS REPORT>
Require user user1 user2
</LimitExcept>
</Location>

could work, but i have not tested it. (Maybe user1 and user2 also need to be in the Limit-block or simply put require valid-user in there)
Have a look at the documentation for Apache:
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/core.html#limit

I'll try to research some stuff a bit later (kinda busy at the moment) and create a follow up post on the various Options to allow finer-granulation.

]]> By: Kevin http://www.stum.de/about/comment-page-1/#comment-380 Kevin Tue, 08 Jul 2008 16:28:35 +0000 #comment-380 I read your blog over subversion and it was very helpful on getting me running... I am however running into one issue and wanted to ask for your advice. I read the second part of your suberversion blog (over multiple repos) and wanted to do something similar to what you are doing (1 auth file with multiple repos) but I am not sure how to keep someone (userx) out of a particular repo completely (I do not want them even having read access)... i.e, Repo1, 2 and 3 - User1, 2 and 3 Repo1 only can be accessed (read and write) by User 1,2 but 3 can read Repo2 only can be accessed by 1 and 2 (3 can't even read) Repo 3 can be accessed by all with full permissions.. Does any of this make sense! Do you recommend me doing anything here? I am lost and can't find anything in my searches, only similar examples like in your blog. Not a complete block in the repo for any given user... BTW: I do like the skating - seems very cool, also checked your video on google - looks like a great time! Respectfully, Kevin Wilson I read your blog over subversion and it was very helpful on getting me running... I am however running into one issue and wanted to ask for your advice. I read the second part of your suberversion blog (over multiple repos) and wanted to do something similar to what you are doing (1 auth file with multiple repos) but I am not sure how to keep someone (userx) out of a particular repo completely (I do not want them even having read access)...

i.e,

Repo1, 2 and 3 - User1, 2 and 3

Repo1 only can be accessed (read and write) by User 1,2 but 3 can read
Repo2 only can be accessed by 1 and 2 (3 can't even read)
Repo 3 can be accessed by all with full permissions..

Does any of this make sense! Do you recommend me doing anything here? I am lost and can't find anything in my searches, only similar examples like in your blog. Not a complete block in the repo for any given user...

BTW: I do like the skating - seems very cool, also checked your video on google - looks like a great time!

Respectfully,
Kevin Wilson

]]>